Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-08 19:23:47 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 79121ADC0A2E439DB75AE1A099420F8EB435F49ABA07CA4691A87A952DCEFAFC
Participant Details

Original Note:

Private Eye is a satiracle magazine, I therefore believe there is a very high chance of their response being satirical!

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1810351704082145598
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 79121ADC0A2E439DB75AE1A099420F8EB435F49ABA07CA4691A87A952DCEFAFC
  • createdAtMillis - 1720466627694
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 181035170408214559879121ADC0A2E439DB75AE1A099420F8EB435F49ABA07CA4691A87A952DCEFAFC