Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-08 23:22:21 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5723C498ED89748CAF3D717B16DB60BB0B9944B1C7F8FD591D38E01F38684455
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Washington Times has disabled comments on this post, rendering CN as the only place to point out the inherently conservative bias that is fundamental to it's reporting for four decades. https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/intelligence-report/2015/washington-times-has-history-hyped-stories-shoddy-reporting-and-failing-correct-errors

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1810350355349475343
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5723C498ED89748CAF3D717B16DB60BB0B9944B1C7F8FD591D38E01F38684455
  • createdAtMillis - 1720480941529
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 18103503553494753435723C498ED89748CAF3D717B16DB60BB0B9944B1C7F8FD591D38E01F38684455