Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-09 10:45:54 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F19BF5E625EAF859F46A90038B9E2DAC7E50E800FF37D2CD8EDAD6169994EF1E
Participant Details

Original Note:

All of the notes fail to refer to evidence for meaning of Correspondence type articles published by the Lancet. These, like articles marked Editorial or Comment; are not usually *externally* peer-reviewed but are subject to the journal editors review and selection processes. https://www.thelancet.com/what-we-publish

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1810315590189584423
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F19BF5E625EAF859F46A90038B9E2DAC7E50E800FF37D2CD8EDAD6169994EF1E
  • createdAtMillis - 1720521954702
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1810315590189584423F19BF5E625EAF859F46A90038B9E2DAC7E50E800FF37D2CD8EDAD6169994EF1E