Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-10 10:11:58 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2369B61FA16E20C9BC7DC697A2DFFEA99E9084B1AB57B593D16EDEDAE7504544
Participant Details

Original Note:

All of the notes fail to refer to evidence for meaning of Correspondence type articles published by the Lancet. These, like articles marked Editorial or Comment; are not usually *externally* peer-reviewed but are subject to the journal editors review and selection processes. https://www.thelancet.com/what-we-publish

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1810315590189584423
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2369B61FA16E20C9BC7DC697A2DFFEA99E9084B1AB57B593D16EDEDAE7504544
  • createdAtMillis - 1720606318676
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18103155901895844232369B61FA16E20C9BC7DC697A2DFFEA99E9084B1AB57B593D16EDEDAE7504544