Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-31 18:31:41 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8CBA427D2288013F1C3DEA650AA1CC5D65A04F4F858EBCAE7E49DE30AF1A5B28
Participant Details

Original Note:

Contrary to OP's claim, this is not a regular peer-reviewed article, but a "Correspondence", which are basically readers’ letters, with reflections on topics of general interest, that are not peer-reviewed. https://www.thelancet.com/what-we-publish#:~:text=Content%20type-,Correspondence,-What%20it%20is

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1810201513312059709
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8CBA427D2288013F1C3DEA650AA1CC5D65A04F4F858EBCAE7E49DE30AF1A5B28
  • createdAtMillis - 1722450701229
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18102015133120597098CBA427D2288013F1C3DEA650AA1CC5D65A04F4F858EBCAE7E49DE30AF1A5B28