Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-08 08:29:41 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0C00D5331E08300DAFB51EEA2E7132B1020ABE0CBE130C07EA204F6DA00011E9
Participant Details

Original Note:

This article is NOT an estimate from The Lancet. It is clearly shown as "Correspondence" - "Our readers’ reflections on content published in the Lancet journals or on other topics of general interest to our readers. These letters are not normally externally peer reviewed" https://www.thelancet.com/what-we-publish https://x.com/supertolerant/status/1810094865671131618

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1810101257995981005
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0C00D5331E08300DAFB51EEA2E7132B1020ABE0CBE130C07EA204F6DA00011E9
  • createdAtMillis - 1720427381535
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18101012579959810050C00D5331E08300DAFB51EEA2E7132B1020ABE0CBE130C07EA204F6DA00011E9