Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-08 00:02:58 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E358D5E6C7CD5B5F90B8E2456E9F411E48EB6EAC7338FE33289267680481E20C
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The OP doesn’t claim the article was externally reviewed. It simply says it was published in the Lancet, which is correct.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1810076058399686946
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E358D5E6C7CD5B5F90B8E2456E9F411E48EB6EAC7338FE33289267680481E20C
  • createdAtMillis - 1720396978860
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1810076058399686946E358D5E6C7CD5B5F90B8E2456E9F411E48EB6EAC7338FE33289267680481E20C