Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-08 11:26:08 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FE3CCA6E63FCD7B667E4B226A5AC087B9E33FFAEE34753B71E4C1FB3F3AA8C77
Participant Details

Original Note:

The article is published in the 'Correspondence' section of The Lancet, which is dedicated to "Our readers’ reflections on content published in the Lancet journals or on other topics of general interest to our readers. These letters are not normally externally peer reviewed." https://www.thelancet.com/what-we-publish

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1810070984034275672
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FE3CCA6E63FCD7B667E4B226A5AC087B9E33FFAEE34753B71E4C1FB3F3AA8C77
  • createdAtMillis - 1720437968859
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1810070984034275672FE3CCA6E63FCD7B667E4B226A5AC087B9E33FFAEE34753B71E4C1FB3F3AA8C77