Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-10 02:43:27 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F4546B31C15BEFE5A94F3A43C041F877CCE1F7F03D1A0F2902E1EBE8178150EB
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN, she did not claim Trump is immune for any crime as claimed in the proposed note, she specifically notes for conduct in the WH. The SCOTUS ruling also makes inadmissable most evidence that could be used for acts taken while POTUS even if the acts themselves are not official

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1809920222037508432
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F4546B31C15BEFE5A94F3A43C041F877CCE1F7F03D1A0F2902E1EBE8178150EB
  • createdAtMillis - 1720579407093
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1809920222037508432F4546B31C15BEFE5A94F3A43C041F877CCE1F7F03D1A0F2902E1EBE8178150EB