Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-07 06:19:16 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8F0DC2E49BCA4105CD8DED25E4E6B11EE58F570FC66E0971166517F7600B9091
Participant Details

Original Note:

A review of Sovacool's (2009) analysis about their mistakes https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S030142150900620X

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1809827824259248271
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8F0DC2E49BCA4105CD8DED25E4E6B11EE58F570FC66E0971166517F7600B9091
  • createdAtMillis - 1720333156725
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18098278242592482718F0DC2E49BCA4105CD8DED25E4E6B11EE58F570FC66E0971166517F7600B9091