Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-07 04:51:00 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9F393C36D544E67774F67873F8CA54BECA8152813BD211EEBEB4B5FA8AD38804
Participant Details

Original Note:

※重要な背景情報を追加します。 『経済を好循環へ』とありますが、実際の経済効果は、0.2～0.5 兆円程度にとどまると試算されており、決して好循環になるわけではない点に注意が必要です。 また、物価高騰が続く中、所得税減税よりも消費税減税の方が、経済効果が高いことは明らかであり、 1回限りの定額減税では、物価高に苦しむ中小業者は救われません。 https://www.dir.co.jp/report/research/economics/japan/20240614_024450.pdf https://www.zenshoren.or.jp/2024/04/01/post-31337 https://mainichi.jp/articles/20240430/k00/00m/010/176000c https://mainichi.jp/articles/20240525/ddm/005/070/120000c

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1809592854337184154
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9F393C36D544E67774F67873F8CA54BECA8152813BD211EEBEB4B5FA8AD38804
  • createdAtMillis - 1720327860270
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 18095928543371841549F393C36D544E67774F67873F8CA54BECA8152813BD211EEBEB4B5FA8AD38804