Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-05 18:29:42 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 01BDAFA3017D579D4538FD7F013C5758BB47D8A3586E698FB5523DDE82C62B32
Participant Details

Original Note:

Como mencionado no post, havia uma ambiguidade na lei, por isso Lula não foi indiciado. Essa ambiguidade deixou de existir em 2016, quando o TCU concluiu que a interpretação da lei estava equivocada, e determinou que o ex-presidente devolvesse os presentes recebidos. https://portal.tcu.gov.br/imprensa/noticias/tcu-determina-incorporacao-de-presentes-recebidos-pelos-ex-presidentes-da-republica-a-uniao.htm https://www.gov.br/secom/pt-br/fatos/brasil-contra-fake/noticias/2023/08/qual-a-real-situacao-dos-presentes-recebidos-pelo-presidente https://www1.folha.uol.com.br/poder/2023/08/saiba-a-diferenca-entre-os-presentes-recebidos-por-lula-e-dilma-e-o-caso-das-joias-sauditas.shtml

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1809003901053555091
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 01BDAFA3017D579D4538FD7F013C5758BB47D8A3586E698FB5523DDE82C62B32
  • createdAtMillis - 1720204182439
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 180900390105355509101BDAFA3017D579D4538FD7F013C5758BB47D8A3586E698FB5523DDE82C62B32