Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-04 21:19:16 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F8132930270E2186513AB367E05D0EF6C514E02A8E09B3B5BB8DFE72857D5693
Participant Details

Original Note:

The post is misleading as the case was ruled upon in 2021 by the Ohio Supreme Court and the property owner was not deemed liable,while the post infers that the case is stilll pending. The post is probably intended to attract engagemnt. https://www.courtnewsohio.gov/cases/2021/SCO/1124/201057.asp

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1808947954717167651
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F8132930270E2186513AB367E05D0EF6C514E02A8E09B3B5BB8DFE72857D5693
  • createdAtMillis - 1720127956439
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1808947954717167651F8132930270E2186513AB367E05D0EF6C514E02A8E09B3B5BB8DFE72857D5693