Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-05 03:17:12 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F3DD943F0FCD8F54890347C8BEC92E580FCB2391E3C8DCEF096CED8CF556BB93
Participant Details

Original Note:

The post is misleading as the case was ruled upon in 2021 by the Ohio Supreme Court and the property owner was not deemed liable,while the post infers that the case is stilll pending. The post is probably intended to attract engagemnt. https://www.courtnewsohio.gov/cases/2021/SCO/1124/201057.asp

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1808947954717167651
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F3DD943F0FCD8F54890347C8BEC92E580FCB2391E3C8DCEF096CED8CF556BB93
  • createdAtMillis - 1720149432549
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1808947954717167651F3DD943F0FCD8F54890347C8BEC92E580FCB2391E3C8DCEF096CED8CF556BB93