Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-05 11:13:43 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8BE7042C1239233CDFE2879997D9E232309E554660B3E9F0D7CE4825B7811BF1
Participant Details

Original Note:

The post is misleading as the case was ruled upon in 2021 by the Ohio Supreme Court and the property owner was not deemed liable,while the post infers that the case is stilll pending. The post is probably intended to attract engagemnt. https://www.courtnewsohio.gov/cases/2021/SCO/1124/201057.asp

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1808947954717167651
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8BE7042C1239233CDFE2879997D9E232309E554660B3E9F0D7CE4825B7811BF1
  • createdAtMillis - 1720178023143
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18089479547171676518BE7042C1239233CDFE2879997D9E232309E554660B3E9F0D7CE4825B7811BF1