Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-05 09:44:17 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5822FCA2BF5046ACC23FE75C453A8E870F07D2C15A0328FF0B7AE55237677C43
Participant Details

Original Note:

The post is misleading as the case was ruled upon in 2021 by the Ohio Supreme Court and the property owner was not deemed liable,while the post infers that the case is stilll pending. The post is probably intended to attract engagemnt. https://www.courtnewsohio.gov/cases/2021/SCO/1124/201057.asp

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1808947954717167651
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5822FCA2BF5046ACC23FE75C453A8E870F07D2C15A0328FF0B7AE55237677C43
  • createdAtMillis - 1720172657388
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18089479547171676515822FCA2BF5046ACC23FE75C453A8E870F07D2C15A0328FF0B7AE55237677C43