Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-04 18:31:15 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3B54FFCA618211907D83A0E334193286FCBAEA6FC3162E5A95A9F72623BCB81B
Participant Details

Original Note:

El mensaje insinúa que el Tribunal Supremo prevarica al reducir esta condena cuando la realidad es que, en su primera versión, la Ley del Solo Sí es Sí cambiaba las horquillas de las penas sin incluir una disposición transitoria que excluyese a los ya condenados. https://www.boe.es/buscar/act.php?id=BOE-A-2022-14630

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1808914808701661280
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3B54FFCA618211907D83A0E334193286FCBAEA6FC3162E5A95A9F72623BCB81B
  • createdAtMillis - 1720117875574
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18089148087016612803B54FFCA618211907D83A0E334193286FCBAEA6FC3162E5A95A9F72623BCB81B