Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-04 14:33:47 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 16424F3B98D705485A61A3BBC465F3B813CF23F9936FD04A4BEF20A49B4B094F
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN Les notes sont faites pour dénoncer un propos trompeur et pas pour cibler une phrase au milieu d'une argumentation. Juger du niveau tolérable d'inégalités n'est pas affaire de faits, c'est une question d'opinions. Article sur le fondement scientifique de la courbe : https://www.cairn.info/revue-gestion-et-finances-publiques-2019-1-page-73.htm

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1808847814710972782
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 16424F3B98D705485A61A3BBC465F3B813CF23F9936FD04A4BEF20A49B4B094F
createdAtMillis - 1720103627723
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 1
notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 180884781471097278216424F3B98D705485A61A3BBC465F3B813CF23F9936FD04A4BEF20A49B4B094F