Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-04 10:20:39 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FD9D634B5E3595FCEA06C5B5995C7396927425DD8E65E7994DC893F223D0F3FC
Participant Details

Original Note:

いずれも前後関係と因果関係の違いを理解していない場合に陥る前後即因果の誤謬です https://globis.jp/article/1847/ この過ちを引きずると3た論法により,統計的な分析をすれば意味のない治療法でも,意味のある治療法だと誤解してしまいます https://note.chugai-pharm.co.jp/n/nd5dc41ea6915 エビデンスを示すには十分な検討が必要なので,本投稿のような論理破綻を防ぐことに繋がります

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1808791706097365008
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FD9D634B5E3595FCEA06C5B5995C7396927425DD8E65E7994DC893F223D0F3FC
  • createdAtMillis - 1720088439930
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1808791706097365008FD9D634B5E3595FCEA06C5B5995C7396927425DD8E65E7994DC893F223D0F3FC