Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-04 13:36:34 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A92223939FBDDEBB1C608E7DCA27D30909DA8DD3678AF853FEDB2FB3144FD9EF
Participant Details

Original Note:

いずれも前後関係と因果関係の違いを理解していない場合に陥る前後即因果の誤謬です https://globis.jp/article/1847/ この過ちを引きずると3た論法により,統計的な分析をすれば意味のない治療法でも,意味のある治療法だと誤解してしまいます https://note.chugai-pharm.co.jp/n/nd5dc41ea6915 エビデンスを示すには十分な検討が必要なので,本投稿のような論理破綻を防ぐことに繋がります

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1808791706097365008
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A92223939FBDDEBB1C608E7DCA27D30909DA8DD3678AF853FEDB2FB3144FD9EF
  • createdAtMillis - 1720100194845
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1808791706097365008A92223939FBDDEBB1C608E7DCA27D30909DA8DD3678AF853FEDB2FB3144FD9EF