Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-04 17:56:02 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EC8A76DC4FCE8A527D97DD23E4A93238B5F2CB14E59C6EEBD8C33DB7CB354940
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. In addition to the reasons already cited why no CN is needed, the proposed CN is incorrect in saying "No factual basis supporting the claims have been presented". Grand jury testimony from the victim and others has been released, along with call logs.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1808712554795184563
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EC8A76DC4FCE8A527D97DD23E4A93238B5F2CB14E59C6EEBD8C33DB7CB354940
  • createdAtMillis - 1720115762766
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1808712554795184563EC8A76DC4FCE8A527D97DD23E4A93238B5F2CB14E59C6EEBD8C33DB7CB354940