Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-04 04:56:19 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8F0DC2E49BCA4105CD8DED25E4E6B11EE58F570FC66E0971166517F7600B9091
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. In addition to the reasons already cited why no CN is needed, the proposed CN is incorrect in saying "No factual basis supporting the claims have been presented". Grand jury testimony from the victim and others has been released, along with call logs.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1808712554795184563
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8F0DC2E49BCA4105CD8DED25E4E6B11EE58F570FC66E0971166517F7600B9091
  • createdAtMillis - 1720068979125
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18087125547951845638F0DC2E49BCA4105CD8DED25E4E6B11EE58F570FC66E0971166517F7600B9091