Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-04 04:21:29 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 49B29532124F4AC4F336E384F27172C47A6867CE7B7689E5E112683ABA3D351B
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. In addition to the reasons already cited why no CN is needed, the proposed CN is incorrect in saying "No factual basis supporting the claims have been presented". Grand jury testimony from the victim and others has been released, along with call logs.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1808712554795184563
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 49B29532124F4AC4F336E384F27172C47A6867CE7B7689E5E112683ABA3D351B
  • createdAtMillis - 1720066889589
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 180871255479518456349B29532124F4AC4F336E384F27172C47A6867CE7B7689E5E112683ABA3D351B