Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-05 17:55:39 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1B85CAA753DA0F211065251E1F1922C59928F9C6924EA8F1E81ABE04489B5870
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. In addition to the reasons already cited why no CN is needed, the proposed CN is incorrect in saying "No factual basis supporting the claims have been presented". Grand jury testimony from the victim and others has been released, along with call logs.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1808712554795184563
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1B85CAA753DA0F211065251E1F1922C59928F9C6924EA8F1E81ABE04489B5870
  • createdAtMillis - 1720202139458
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18087125547951845631B85CAA753DA0F211065251E1F1922C59928F9C6924EA8F1E81ABE04489B5870