Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-04 03:34:34 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 14AF1411665738F7224582DADBA97F19096EF24A593FDF278961A4764D884A53
Participant Details

Original Note:

Ofcom Watch does not appear to exist in any meaningful way. There is no website linked from the Guido article, nor any statement of any kind from such an organisation shown. The logo displayed returns zero results on a Google search. There's only an X account set up in March. https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Ofcom+Watch%22

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1808627121457353024
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 14AF1411665738F7224582DADBA97F19096EF24A593FDF278961A4764D884A53
  • createdAtMillis - 1720064074909
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 180862712145735302414AF1411665738F7224582DADBA97F19096EF24A593FDF278961A4764D884A53