Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-04 16:18:36 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7BA5D52F68F8D7ACB981AED1D083C59FCD9322BD070B4EDF0C39A6B50748E8BE
Participant Details

Original Note:

There's a confusingly worded CN that claims to be from Ofcom, but with no explanation of why it's there and what it means for this case. If Ofcom wants to make any kind of statement about the case, that would likely be welcome in a post or reply, but not as an invisible CN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1808551731657125933
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7BA5D52F68F8D7ACB981AED1D083C59FCD9322BD070B4EDF0C39A6B50748E8BE
  • createdAtMillis - 1720109916440
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18085517316571259337BA5D52F68F8D7ACB981AED1D083C59FCD9322BD070B4EDF0C39A6B50748E8BE