Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-03 19:43:55 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AE9BAF9F1C7A8520AAEEF0E57EF7B4672484635EC14C00F87FB049BA97C67232
Participant Details

Original Note:

Conviene contextualizar que El Plural, cuando dio la exclusiva, dijo que sería muy raro que fuera un error en el registro, y especuló en su lugar con que el juez Peinado fuera un agente secreto o que hubiera recibido un trato favorable de alguien del Ministerio del Interior. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.elplural.com/politica/espana/sin-noticias-ministerio-interior_332871102_amp

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1808516507023851991
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AE9BAF9F1C7A8520AAEEF0E57EF7B4672484635EC14C00F87FB049BA97C67232
  • createdAtMillis - 1720035835208
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1808516507023851991AE9BAF9F1C7A8520AAEEF0E57EF7B4672484635EC14C00F87FB049BA97C67232