Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-04 08:18:14 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 35C681E320A15E43E3BA8B5E6F86CFA0C95F57D9B131B223619589AEF27A96AE
Participant Details

Original Note:

While all three emphasized the importance of the rule of law and that judges must follow legal precedent - this is not a quote from any confirmation hearing. Further, the conclusion that this ruling favored a single president over the rule of law is a spurious claim. https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2024/07/01/politics/presidents-immunity-supreme-court-what-matters

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1808502732858216699
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 35C681E320A15E43E3BA8B5E6F86CFA0C95F57D9B131B223619589AEF27A96AE
  • createdAtMillis - 1720081094122
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 180850273285821669935C681E320A15E43E3BA8B5E6F86CFA0C95F57D9B131B223619589AEF27A96AE