Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-04 06:15:51 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F704FC09E050ECBFFF6159E39DECCD2315D3AA9395BA4E794B091B6C801539C6
Participant Details

Original Note:

Ofcom Watch does not appear to exist in any meaningful way. There is no website linked from the Guido article, nor any statement of any kind from such an organisation shown. The logo displayed returns zero results on a Google search. There's only an X account set up in March. https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Ofcom+Watch%22

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1808501942575833215
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F704FC09E050ECBFFF6159E39DECCD2315D3AA9395BA4E794B091B6C801539C6
  • createdAtMillis - 1720073751241
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1808501942575833215F704FC09E050ECBFFF6159E39DECCD2315D3AA9395BA4E794B091B6C801539C6