Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-03 14:07:30 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 66A4EEDBE919B160F9F3A36FA37908D402940C3F5EAC095B57CC9BB7AB52EDC2
Participant Details

Original Note:

Ofcom Watch does not appear to exist in any meaningful way. There is no website linked from the Guido article, nor any statement of any kind from such an organisation shown. The logo displayed returns zero results on a Google search. There's only an X account set up in March. https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Ofcom+Watch%22

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1808501942575833215
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 66A4EEDBE919B160F9F3A36FA37908D402940C3F5EAC095B57CC9BB7AB52EDC2
  • createdAtMillis - 1720015650161
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 180850194257583321566A4EEDBE919B160F9F3A36FA37908D402940C3F5EAC095B57CC9BB7AB52EDC2