Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-03 19:01:57 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 95B8D5B9CD19816E73E7FED6E8EECD198D4F3139279F4617D17D4403F48454FC
Participant Details

Original Note:

The case referenced in the OP was dismissed in 2016 because it fails to state a civil rights claim against defendants. https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4154484/katie-johnson-v-donald-j-trump/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1808346469289566547
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 95B8D5B9CD19816E73E7FED6E8EECD198D4F3139279F4617D17D4403F48454FC
  • createdAtMillis - 1720033317640
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 180834646928956654795B8D5B9CD19816E73E7FED6E8EECD198D4F3139279F4617D17D4403F48454FC