Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-03 05:32:52 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F9961995A0DD8597DFE77B0EDA85500632388754A6497FC0C90774DF06CC73BD
Participant Details

Original Note:

El TC no ha dicho, ni insinuado, que no hubiera corrupción, ni ninguna de las cosas que se enumeran en el tweet. Ha anulado las sentencias por prevaricación continuada por motivos técnico-jurídicos, no porque no hubiera delito, y ordena una nueva valoración de los hechos. https://t.co/g8HBRR1Xv0 https://x.com/TConstitucionE/status/1805317503356186810 https://x.com/TuiteroMartin/status/1808137284199305646

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1808214902345289902
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F9961995A0DD8597DFE77B0EDA85500632388754A6497FC0C90774DF06CC73BD
  • createdAtMillis - 1719984772871
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1808214902345289902F9961995A0DD8597DFE77B0EDA85500632388754A6497FC0C90774DF06CC73BD