Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-02 19:19:59 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F02B5DA4112752DDCD638862F82B474288D56235F7A6657E93D18E85D5AE9041
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. It clearly states underneath the data “Voting intention based on 12,755 doorstep conversations”. If you want to challenge the relevance of the methodology do so in the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1808214133579317336
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F02B5DA4112752DDCD638862F82B474288D56235F7A6657E93D18E85D5AE9041
  • createdAtMillis - 1719947999337
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1808214133579317336F02B5DA4112752DDCD638862F82B474288D56235F7A6657E93D18E85D5AE9041