Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-03 13:55:50 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E5C994784269F312CC69681983C64C7AF7D7E57F39DA59B2431333F7D44B328C
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. It clearly states underneath the data “Voting intention based on 12,755 doorstep conversations”. If you want to challenge the relevance of the methodology do so in the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1808214133579317336
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E5C994784269F312CC69681983C64C7AF7D7E57F39DA59B2431333F7D44B328C
  • createdAtMillis - 1720014950011
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1808214133579317336E5C994784269F312CC69681983C64C7AF7D7E57F39DA59B2431333F7D44B328C