Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-03 18:01:39 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B641FC9E2028385DBD438DF2BDEA394A5CE04769E2B62D8DEB29A3D0DD4B6E4D
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. It clearly states underneath the data “Voting intention based on 12,755 doorstep conversations”. If you want to challenge the relevance of the methodology do so in the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1808214133579317336
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B641FC9E2028385DBD438DF2BDEA394A5CE04769E2B62D8DEB29A3D0DD4B6E4D
  • createdAtMillis - 1720029699037
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1808214133579317336B641FC9E2028385DBD438DF2BDEA394A5CE04769E2B62D8DEB29A3D0DD4B6E4D