Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-03 14:38:25 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 93275629574AC5E3604BB42E8CBDF492F85ACE2732F2167D5E5A5F07D48BEF1F
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. It clearly states underneath the data “Voting intention based on 12,755 doorstep conversations”. If you want to challenge the relevance of the methodology do so in the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1808214133579317336
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 93275629574AC5E3604BB42E8CBDF492F85ACE2732F2167D5E5A5F07D48BEF1F
  • createdAtMillis - 1720017505999
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 180821413357931733693275629574AC5E3604BB42E8CBDF492F85ACE2732F2167D5E5A5F07D48BEF1F