Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-02 20:15:33 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6E3539EF3A5383FADCCD29124CFF71C9685D2BA86AC8E8C6633F65B4BEEC0151
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. It clearly states underneath the data “Voting intention based on 12,755 doorstep conversations”. If you want to challenge the relevance of the methodology do so in the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1808214133579317336
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6E3539EF3A5383FADCCD29124CFF71C9685D2BA86AC8E8C6633F65B4BEEC0151
  • createdAtMillis - 1719951333762
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18082141335793173366E3539EF3A5383FADCCD29124CFF71C9685D2BA86AC8E8C6633F65B4BEEC0151