Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-02 23:37:52 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DDC7721E26A3FADDEA3AB665E674B83ED072D149A86B19D204783AE0D3DC547A
Participant Details

Original Note:

The headline of the article is likely intended to cause anger and farm engagement. The body of the article focuses on corporations gaming the first Amendment for themselves (TikTok claiming 1A allows them to not be banned in US) or the potential of AI gaining the right to 1A. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/02/opinion/supreme-court-netchoice-free-speech.this

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1808200468562124853
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DDC7721E26A3FADDEA3AB665E674B83ED072D149A86B19D204783AE0D3DC547A
  • createdAtMillis - 1719963472260
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1808200468562124853DDC7721E26A3FADDEA3AB665E674B83ED072D149A86B19D204783AE0D3DC547A