Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-02 20:53:11 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B9218816B39574594FEA3665421562FA87E1254AE88CAD0B9F5EFA3AC6A35CEF
Participant Details

Original Note:

The headline of the article is likely intended to cause anger and farm engagement. The body of the article focuses on corporations gaming the first Amendment for themselves (TikTok claiming 1A allows them to not be banned in US) or the potential of AI gaining the right to 1A. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/02/opinion/supreme-court-netchoice-free-speech.this

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1808200468562124853
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B9218816B39574594FEA3665421562FA87E1254AE88CAD0B9F5EFA3AC6A35CEF
  • createdAtMillis - 1719953591238
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1808200468562124853B9218816B39574594FEA3665421562FA87E1254AE88CAD0B9F5EFA3AC6A35CEF