Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-03 21:27:19 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6C955C43E61668617950265EA9114F83E9C26089467D4FF89DF2D977A2BB07B6
Participant Details

Original Note:

The headline of the article is likely intended to cause anger and farm engagement. The body of the article focuses on corporations gaming the first Amendment for themselves (TikTok claiming 1A allows them to not be banned in US) or the potential of AI gaining the right to 1A. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/02/opinion/supreme-court-netchoice-free-speech.this

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1808200468562124853
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6C955C43E61668617950265EA9114F83E9C26089467D4FF89DF2D977A2BB07B6
  • createdAtMillis - 1720042039705
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 18082004685621248536C955C43E61668617950265EA9114F83E9C26089467D4FF89DF2D977A2BB07B6