Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-03 07:31:52 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 91F06550A771D4FBCDC5F9F9B5A5CCE66F0A7E3AA77F38D06D6CD3C7466174D0
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is a screenshot of a guest essay about social media companies moderating speech: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/02/opinion/supreme-court-netchoice-free-speech.html Neither the NYT editorial board, editors, or the parent company are arguing for restrictions on freedom of speech in the USA, much less filing lawsuits or lobbying Congress to repeal the 1A: https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/amendment-1/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1808192471718903942
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 91F06550A771D4FBCDC5F9F9B5A5CCE66F0A7E3AA77F38D06D6CD3C7466174D0
  • createdAtMillis - 1719991912524
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 180819247171890394291F06550A771D4FBCDC5F9F9B5A5CCE66F0A7E3AA77F38D06D6CD3C7466174D0