Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-02 19:54:29 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 338588D9A40ECC4EB54783AFA2601EB0DB7E5E1E77968620B444E46B0A54F691
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is a screenshot of a guest essay about social media companies moderating speech: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/02/opinion/supreme-court-netchoice-free-speech.html Neither the NYT editorial board, editors, or the parent company are arguing for restrictions on freedom of speech in the USA, much less filing lawsuits or lobbying Congress to repeal the 1A: https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/amendment-1/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1808192471718903942
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 338588D9A40ECC4EB54783AFA2601EB0DB7E5E1E77968620B444E46B0A54F691
  • createdAtMillis - 1719950069184
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1808192471718903942338588D9A40ECC4EB54783AFA2601EB0DB7E5E1E77968620B444E46B0A54F691