Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-03 13:29:16 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2FFA9C0330E85C81B26387F2047C1E667CFC773C28614F7E3AF290C4E004E740
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is a screenshot of a guest essay about social media companies moderating speech: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/02/opinion/supreme-court-netchoice-free-speech.html Neither the NYT editorial board, editors, or the parent company are arguing for restrictions on freedom of speech in the USA, much less filing lawsuits or lobbying Congress to repeal the 1A: https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/amendment-1/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1808192471718903942
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2FFA9C0330E85C81B26387F2047C1E667CFC773C28614F7E3AF290C4E004E740
  • createdAtMillis - 1720013356500
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18081924717189039422FFA9C0330E85C81B26387F2047C1E667CFC773C28614F7E3AF290C4E004E740