Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-02 22:29:38 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DD5E21437DB3178F810298FD1F3044E6359DC1107AF47D131199BF39061FECDB
Participant Details

Original Note:

This frames the Times article as against the freedom of speech of people However the article itself is explicitly about how freedom of speech applies to corporations: IE: criticism of how social media companies “totalitarian” control of content is considered speech. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/02/opinion/supreme-court-netchoice-free-speech.html https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1769771195035984073?s=46&t=luW-5lplHzey8rSIeWa0Uw

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1808182158499909643
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DD5E21437DB3178F810298FD1F3044E6359DC1107AF47D131199BF39061FECDB
  • createdAtMillis - 1719959378493
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1808182158499909643DD5E21437DB3178F810298FD1F3044E6359DC1107AF47D131199BF39061FECDB