Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-02 16:44:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AC1B673B8ECEC4A47B47D6A83231E90C29C050A17F3727E589D5829DD5993389
Participant Details

Original Note:

The original post is the author's opinion of the results of the ruling. Although we used to only have the steps in the note above to change it, what SCOTUS essentially did was change the constitution by judicial fiat and thus "greatly increasing presidential power in perpetuity".

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1808179692878680473
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AC1B673B8ECEC4A47B47D6A83231E90C29C050A17F3727E589D5829DD5993389
  • createdAtMillis - 1719938691649
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1808179692878680473AC1B673B8ECEC4A47B47D6A83231E90C29C050A17F3727E589D5829DD5993389