Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-02 17:49:36 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 39F62F1073CCEF1D2810B09405AA2B7CEC58B2F0D4E5B84EF34E4EDC2BE50D26
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The intention of this post is to point out that the precedent set by SCOTUS has legal consequences comparable to a constitutional amendment. While the latter requires broad political consensus, the former was achieved by the opinion of only 6 justices.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1808172481049776274
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 39F62F1073CCEF1D2810B09405AA2B7CEC58B2F0D4E5B84EF34E4EDC2BE50D26
  • createdAtMillis - 1719942576003
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 180817248104977627439F62F1073CCEF1D2810B09405AA2B7CEC58B2F0D4E5B84EF34E4EDC2BE50D26