Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-02 19:40:35 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 755855FAAF649A595F9BB3E485CB44DFEE1659F8CA6D2936513D5ABAA5FDF495
Participant Details

Original Note:

病気や障害などによる、いわゆる「悪筆」である投票は以前から見られます。 https://www.nhk.or.jp/aomori-blog2/3010/484902.html 具体的な「悪筆」票の例や、それが選管によってどのように判断されるのかは次の記事が参考になります。 https://withnews.jp/article/f0160604001qq000000000000000G00110101qq000013492A

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1808031339914187215
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 755855FAAF649A595F9BB3E485CB44DFEE1659F8CA6D2936513D5ABAA5FDF495
  • createdAtMillis - 1719949235175
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1808031339914187215755855FAAF649A595F9BB3E485CB44DFEE1659F8CA6D2936513D5ABAA5FDF495