Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-04 03:48:20 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FDF4F922818B7DE40D340921EAA27F0561645E0B9D94AA2405A8F53A8E23A2A8
Participant Details

Original Note:

The supreme court did not decide that this was an official act (the content included in the attached video). It considered his conversations with the Attorney General to be an official act with the remaining acts up to lower court discussion. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf The full opinion can be read^

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1807999815285870829
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FDF4F922818B7DE40D340921EAA27F0561645E0B9D94AA2405A8F53A8E23A2A8
  • createdAtMillis - 1720064900592
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1807999815285870829FDF4F922818B7DE40D340921EAA27F0561645E0B9D94AA2405A8F53A8E23A2A8