Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-02 05:17:19 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 436DF23FB2C0E1A75863C806B8D2ED8E73F974F8C0CC074A11FA74161774412D
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN: Suggested community note is misleading at worst and an opinion at best. The listed case only clarifies presidential immunity from liability for civil damages, not criminal acts. Immunity for criminal acts being a fundamental change is an opinion. Respond in the replies. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/457/731/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1807965112126386647
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 436DF23FB2C0E1A75863C806B8D2ED8E73F974F8C0CC074A11FA74161774412D
  • createdAtMillis - 1719897439541
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1807965112126386647436DF23FB2C0E1A75863C806B8D2ED8E73F974F8C0CC074A11FA74161774412D