Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-02 11:07:39 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 17205A8D0C31E1983E1E818799A348D0E76BFC88D7D607F3A5ECF81FCBAB5E4B
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN: Suggested community note is misleading at worst and an opinion at best. The listed case only clarifies presidential immunity from liability for civil damages, not criminal acts. Immunity for criminal acts being a fundamental change is an opinion. Respond in the replies. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/457/731/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1807965112126386647
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 17205A8D0C31E1983E1E818799A348D0E76BFC88D7D607F3A5ECF81FCBAB5E4B
  • createdAtMillis - 1719918459779
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 180796511212638664717205A8D0C31E1983E1E818799A348D0E76BFC88D7D607F3A5ECF81FCBAB5E4B